![]() |
Photo from Rock Center website |
The longer I watched this piece, the angrier I got. Texas Biomedical Research Institute allowed Rock Center access to its facility in San Antonio so that it could film the chimpanzees in their environment. Dr. Robert Lanford has conducted experiments on chimps for 27 years and defended that research throughout his interview. At one time, he had the gall to say he would rather see chimps suffer the consequences of failed research than human volunteers. Was that supposed to endear him to the public and make him appear magnanimous? It did exactly the opposite. He came across as arrogant and out-of-tune with modern views on animal research.
The United States is one of only two countries in the world--in the entire world--that still experiments on primates. These animals share 98% of their DNA with humans. That makes them the prime target for animal researchers to use in their studies. Dr. Jane Goodall commented that the research center could, at the very least, retire Ken and Rosie and allow them to live out the rest of their existence in a sanctuary that would allow them to to roam free. Goodall likened the invasive procedures done in research to torture and their caged environments to prisons. When she spoke about research chimps as powerless, I hope Dr. Lanford was watching. Humans have experienced enough torture and unwanted experimentation in their lives to empathize with chimpanzees on some level. The lessons learned from the past must have escaped Lanford.
Modern science has a plethora of alternatives to animal testing, and I support using other means of research instead of making chimpanzees a science experiment. Are we so unevolved in this country that we must choose actions that summon the Dark Ages? Dr. John VandeBerg, who oversees the research center, proudly stated that the animals are treated humanely and have outdoor facilities in which to live. I was not impressed. Even though the conditions are an improvement over the cramped quarter of previous labs, the chimps still have no choice in the matter.
When VandeBerg defended the decision to keep Ken and Rosie as research animals, in case they might be needed for future experiments, I had an urge to throttle him. He continued by comparing the two aging chimpanzees to library books, saying that the books were not constantly in use but were there when you wanted them. That sealed the deal for me. To compare an intelligent living creature to an inanimate, man-made object reveals exactly the problem with his viewpoint.
The story included footage of the National Chimpanzee Sanctuary in Shreveport, Louisiana. After working as a behaviorist at the research center for 16 years, Dr. Linda Brent built the sanctuary with funding that came, in part, from the federal government. The chimps, who have been retired from research and sent to "Chimp Haven", as it has been dubbed by locals, live the way that those in the wild do. Brent said that her years in Texas touched her deeply and gave her an appreciation for what intelligent, sensitive creatures chimpanzees are.
Rosie and Ken should be set free immediately! They have suffered enough in the name of science. Dr. Lanford and Dr.VandeBerg should submit to a research study or two and live in a cage for awhile to understand what those animals must feel. Ham on Wry believes that no matter how much the appearance of a lab has changed, its purpose hasn't. It's time for the United States to join the 21st Century and the vast majority of the rest of the world by banning chimpanzee research.