![]() |
Senators John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Kelly Ayotte-Win McNamee/Getty Images |
When the framers of the United States Constitution created it, America was sparsely populated with most people living along the eastern seaboard. They couldn't have envisioned a time when candidates elected to Congress would consider it a career choice. In colonial times, people couldn't afford to serve in either the House or the Senate without having to work at another job. Not so in 2012. Now members of Congress can serve as long as they are re-elected, despite experiencing a slowdown caused by advanced age.
How can voters determine if someone has stayed too long and has run out of fresh ideas? The complex answer involves many factors, some of which are almost impossible to detect. If a member of Congress has dementia, it limits ability to reason logically. If readers think that could never happen, remember President Reagan showed signs of it when he was first elected and it progressed to Alzheimer's before he left office. Few voters spend hours watching Congress at work, and, therefore, can't see whether an official adopts an intransigent stance that blocks action from proceeding to conclusion. We saw that when the 112th Congress took us to the brink of fiscal disaster before an eleventh hour vote.
Now that the election is over, the time has arrived for a national dialogue about how to ensure Senators and Representative don't stay past their prime. Although this blogger favors term limits, which would serve that purpose, many other viable options must exist. Starting the discussion in various forums will at least identify workable solutions that can lead to a Constitutional amendment. We limit the President of the United States to eight years, and those who have served two terms leave office looking more haggard and with a head of gray hair. If citizens believe a president can execute on promises in a maximum of eight years, why do we allow members of Congress to remain for decades?
Senator Robert Byrd spent 51 years in Congress before he died, and Representative John Dingell has served since 1955. Dingell will be serving his 29th term. C'mon! Despite the fact that he has support, does anyone believe he still has the capacity to handle the job effectively?
Logic and reason tell me the answer is "no".